Dynamic Latent State Modeling for Predicting Public Behavior in Digital Ecosystems
Keywords:
Dynamic Latent State Modeling, Public Behavior Prediction, Digital Ecosystems, State Transition Analysis, Behavioral AnalyticsAbstract
This study proposes a Dynamic Latent State Modeling (DLSM) framework to predict public behavior within rapidly evolving digital ecosystems. As online interactions grow increasingly complex shaped by algorithmic exposure, platform norms, and sociopolitical events traditional static models fail to capture the fluidity and nonlinearity of user behavior. Using a combination of Hidden Markov Models, state-space modeling, and probabilistic clustering, this research identifies latent behavioral states underlying observable digital activities such as posting frequency, sentiment shifts, network engagement, and information consumption patterns. Results reveal four major latent states Passive Observation, Selective Engagement, Active Participation, and Reactive Mobilization each corresponding to meaningful psychological and social modes of online behavior. Transition matrices demonstrate that users shift states in response to contextual triggers including emotional content exposure, social reinforcement, platform incentives, and external offline events. The DLSM framework outperforms baseline machine learning classifiers by capturing temporal dependencies and hidden motivational structures influencing online actions. The study offers important implications for digital governance, policy design, crisis communication, marketing strategy, and misinformation management, particularly in anticipating rapid escalations in public sentiment or mobilization. However, limitations include potential dataset biases, constraints on generalizability across platforms, and challenges in detecting synthetic or automated behavior (bots) embedded within user streams. Overall, the research contributes a robust, interpretable, and dynamic approach to understanding and predicting public behavior in complex digital environments.
Downloads
References
J. Van Dijck and T. Poell, “Social media and the transformation of public space,” Soc. Media+ Soc., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 2056305115622482, 2015.
W. Zhang, M. Wang, and Y. Zhu, “Does government information release really matter in regulating contagion-evolution of negative emotion during public emergencies? From the perspective of cognitive big data analytics,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 50, pp. 498–514, 2020.
K. K. R. R. Aldous, “Audience Analytics of Online Media Organizations: A Cross-Platform and Multi-News Outlet Study of the Factors Affecting User Engagement of Social Media Content.” Hamad Bin Khalifa University (Qatar), 2021.
I. Khurana and D. K. Dutta, “From latent to emergent entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: The role of entrepreneurial learning,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 167, p. 120694, 2021.
D. Spruijt-Metz et al., “Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research,” Transl. Behav. Med., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 335–346, 2015.
R. Vohra, K. Goel, and J. K. Sahoo, “Modeling temporal dependencies in data using a DBN-LSTM,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–4.
A. Gu, K. Goel, and C. Ré, “Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2111.00396, 2021.
S. H. Haji and A. M. Abdulazeez, “Comparison of optimization techniques based on gradient descent algorithm: A review,” PalArch’s J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2715–2743, 2021.
J. Wu, X.-Y. Chen, H. Zhang, L.-D. Xiong, H. Lei, and S.-H. Deng, “Hyperparameter optimization for machine learning models based on Bayesian optimization,” J. Electron. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 26–40, 2019.
C. Bergmeir and J. M. Benítez, “On the use of cross-validation for time series predictor evaluation,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 191, pp. 192–213, 2012.
A. Saxena, J. Celaya, B. Saha, S. Saha, and K. Goebel, “Evaluating algorithm performance metrics tailored for prognostics,” in 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–13.
S. D. Kamronn, “Monitoring and modelling of behavioural changes using smartphone and wearable sensing,” 2018.
H. Shahbaznezhad, R. Dolan, and M. Rashidirad, “The role of social media content format and platform in users’ engagement behavior,” J. Interact. Mark., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 47–65, 2021.
T. Nguyen, D. Phung, B. Adams, and S. Venkatesh, “Event extraction using behaviors of sentiment signals and burst structure in social media,” Knowl. Inf. Syst., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 279–304, 2013.
S. Kumar, X. Zhang, and J. Leskovec, “Predicting dynamic embedding trajectory in temporal interaction networks,” in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining, 2019, pp. 1269–1278.
F. Yu and E. Santos, “On Modeling the Interplay Between Opinion Change and Formation.,” in FLAIRS, 2016, pp. 140–145.
E. Kahu, C. Stephens, L. Leach, and N. Zepke, “Linking academic emotions and student engagement: Mature-aged distance students’ transition to university,” J. Furth. High. Educ., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 481–497, 2015.
Q. Xu and S. S. Sundar, “Interactivity and memory: Information processing of interactive versus non-interactive content,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 63, pp. 620–629, 2016.
G. Paltoglou, M. Theunis, A. Kappas, and M. Thelwall, “Predicting emotional responses to long informal text,” IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 106–115, 2012.
M. Muthukrishna and M. Schaller, “Are collectivistic cultures more prone to rapid transformation? Computational models of cross-cultural differences, social network structure, dynamic social influence, and cultural change,” Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 103–120, 2020.
A. L. Cochran and J. M. Cisler, “A flexible and generalizable model of online latent-state learning,” PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 15, no. 9, p. e1007331, 2019.
J. D. Gallacher, “Online intergroup conflict: How the dynamics of online communication drive extremism and violence between groups.” University of Oxford, 2021.
D. Brdari? et al., “A data-informed Public Health Policy-makers platform,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 9, p. 3271, 2020.
N. Richardson, “Emergency Response Planning: Leveraging Machine Learning for Real-Time Decision-Making,” Emergency, vol. 4, p. 14, 2021.
H. Zhang, Y. Li, C. Dolan, and Z. Song, “Observations from Wuhan: an adaptive risk and crisis communication system for a health emergency,” Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy, pp. 3179–3193, 2021.
V. L. Rubin, “Disinformation and misinformation triangle: A conceptual model for ‘fake news’ epidemic, causal factors and interventions,” J. Doc., vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1013–1034, 2019.
A. Backhaus and U. Seiffert, “Classification in high-dimensional spectral data: Accuracy vs. interpretability vs. model size,” Neurocomputing, vol. 131, pp. 15–22, 2014.
C. Hertzog, A. F. Kramer, R. S. Wilson, and U. Lindenberger, “Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced?,” Psychol. Sci. public Interes., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–65, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Firta Sari Panjaitan, Juliana Batubara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
