A Comprehensive Review of Modern Machine Learning Architectures: From Statistical Models to Adaptive Intelligent Computing Systems
Keywords:
Machine Learning Architectures, Deep Learning Models, Transformer Networks, Adaptive Intelligent Systems, Model Scalability and InterpretabilityAbstract
This research presents a comprehensive review of the evolution, performance, and limitations of modern machine learning architectures, spanning from classical statistical models to advanced adaptive intelligent computing systems. By systematically comparing diverse architectural families including linear models, tree-based learners, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), Transformers, and emerging adaptive systems the study evaluates their computational complexity, training efficiency, scalability, data requirements, interpretability, robustness, and adaptability. The findings reveal that while traditional models remain valuable for their simplicity and transparency, deep learning and Transformer-based architectures significantly outperform earlier methods in handling large-scale, high-dimensional, and unstructured data. However, these performance gains come with notable challenges, including high computational and energy costs, adversarial vulnerability, data bias, lack of explainability, and difficulties in deployment on resource-limited devices. The study also compares current results with key findings from the past decade, highlighting both continuities and major advancements in model capabilities, scalability, and reliability. Overall, the research contributes an integrated framework that synthesizes technical, ethical, and practical considerations, offering deeper insights into the strengths, limitations, and future directions of modern machine learning architectures. The study underscores the need for more interpretable, energy-efficient, and ethically aligned AI systems to support responsible and sustainable technological development.
Downloads
References
N. Matloff, Statistical regression and classification: from linear models to machine learning. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017.
J. Schmidhuber and A. Blog, “The 2010s: our decade of deep learning/outlook on the 2020s,” Recent Decad. Most important Dev. Ind. Appl. based our AI, with an outlook 2020s, also addressing Priv. data Mark., 2020.
S. Pouyanfar et al., “A survey on deep learning: Algorithms, techniques, and applications,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1–36, 2018.
T. K. Rodrigues, K. Suto, H. Nishiyama, J. Liu, and N. Kato, “Machine learning meets computation and communication control in evolving edge and cloud: Challenges and future perspective,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 38–67, 2019.
L. B. Lisboa, V. C. Garcia, D. Lucrédio, E. S. de Almeida, S. R. de Lemos Meira, and R. P. de Mattos Fortes, “A systematic review of domain analysis tools,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2010.
V. Ward, A. House, and S. Hamer, “Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature,” J. Health Serv. Res. Policy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 156–164, 2009.
S. Y. Wong, J. H. Chuah, and H. J. Yap, “Technical data-driven tool condition monitoring challenges for CNC milling: a review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 107, no. 11, pp. 4837–4857, 2020.
A. Jaiswal, A. R. Babu, M. Z. Zadeh, D. Banerjee, and F. Makedon, “A survey on contrastive self-supervised learning,” Technologies, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2, 2020.
E. Peltonen et al., “6G white paper on edge intelligence,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2004.14850, 2020.
A. Prabhat and V. Khullar, “Sentiment classification on big data using Naïve Bayes and logistic regression,” in 2017 International conference on computer communication and informatics (ICCCI), IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–5.
J. Shlomi, P. Battaglia, and J.-R. Vlimant, “Graph neural networks in particle physics,” Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 21001, 2020.
S. J. Pan, “Transfer learning,” Learning, vol. 21, pp. 1–2, 2020.
T. V. Kumar, “Generative AI Applications in Customizing User Experiences in Banking Apps,” 2020.
C. Zhang, S. Bengio, M. Hardt, B. Recht, and O. Vinyals, “Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1611.03530, 2016.
P. Linardatos, V. Papastefanopoulos, and S. Kotsiantis, “Explainable ai: A review of machine learning interpretability methods,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 18, 2020.
M. Nalenz and M. Villani, “Tree ensembles with rule structured horseshoe regularization,” Ann. Appl. Stat., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2379–2408, 2018.
R. Challen, J. Denny, M. Pitt, L. Gompels, T. Edwards, and K. Tsaneva-Atanasova, “Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety,” BMJ Qual. Saf., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 231–237, 2019.
S. N. Fallah, R. C. Deo, M. Shojafar, M. Conti, and S. Shamshirband, “Computational intelligence approaches for energy load forecasting in smart energy management grids: state of the art, future challenges, and research directions,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 596, 2018.
C. Burns, J. Thomason, and W. Tansey, “Interpreting black box models via hypothesis testing,” in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM-IMS on foundations of data science conference, 2020, pp. 47–57.
Q. Chen et al., “A survey on an emerging area: Deep learning for smart city data,” IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 392–410, 2019.
C. Chen et al., “Deep learning on computational?resource?limited platforms: A survey,” Mob. Inf. Syst., vol. 2020, no. 1, p. 8454327, 2020.
Z. M. Fadlullah et al., “State-of-the-art deep learning: Evolving machine intelligence toward tomorrow’s intelligent network traffic control systems,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2432–2455, 2017.
U. Hasson, S. A. Nastase, and A. Goldstein, “Direct fit to nature: an evolutionary perspective on biological and artificial neural networks,” Neuron, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 416–434, 2020.
M. Fahad, A. Shahid, R. R. Manumachu, and A. Lastovetsky, “A comparative study of methods for measurement of energy of computing,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 2204, 2019.
V. Castiglioni, M. Loreti, and S. Tini, “Measuring adaptability and reliability of large scale systems,” in International Symposium on Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Springer, 2020, pp. 380–396.
G. Lewis, “A leadership discovery: enhancing Finnish youth football coaches’ effectiveness through the Transformer Research Project,” 2019.
B. Wasserman, P. J. Sullivan, and G. Palermo, Ethics and the Practice of Architecture. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Galih Prakoso Rizky A, Rohani Situmorang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

