A Foundational Model for Data-Driven Decision Systems Using Probabilistic Preference Structures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/cit.Vol17.2025.1396.pp207-217Keywords:
Probabilistic Preference Structures, Data-Driven Decision Systems, Bayesian Inference, Optimal Decision-Making, Preference Learning AlgorithmsAbstract
This research proposes a foundational model for data-driven decision systems based on probabilistic preference structures, addressing the limitations of traditional deterministic and utility-based approaches. The model integrates probability theory, Bayesian inference, and decision theory to represent preferences as flexible probability distributions capable of capturing uncertainty, partial orderings, and multi-attribute trade-offs. A set of novel algorithms is introduced for learning and estimating latent probabilistic preferences from noisy, incomplete, and heterogeneous data sources. These learned preference structures are embedded within an optimization framework that combines Bayesian updating with Markov decision processes, enabling the system to generate optimal decisions under uncertainty. Experimental evaluations conducted across synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate significant improvements in accuracy, robustness, stability, and decision quality compared to existing preference modeling methods. The unified framework also enhances explainability by quantifying uncertainty and providing interpretable probabilistic outputs. The research makes theoretical contributions by establishing a mathematical ontology for probabilistic preferences, methodological contributions through the development of scalable inference and decision algorithms, and practical contributions by enabling reliable decision-making in environments characterized by inconsistent or probabilistic data. Overall, the results validate the proposed framework as a comprehensive and flexible foundation for next-generation intelligent decision systems, offering improved adaptability, reliability, and transparency in complex real-world applications.
Downloads
References
Y. Duan, J. S. Edwards, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 48, pp. 63–71, 2019.
M. Aggarwal and A. Fallah Tehrani, “Modelling human decision behaviour with preference learning,” INFORMS J. Comput., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 318–334, 2019.
D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, H. Prade, and M. Pirlot, Decision making process: Concepts and methods. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
K. J. Strandburg, “Rulemaking and inscrutable automated decision tools,” Columbia Law Rev., vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1851–1886, 2019.
S. Moretti, M. Öztürk, and A. Tsoukiàs, “Preference modelling,” in Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, Springer, 2016, pp. 43–95.
S. R. Johnson, G. A. Tomlinson, G. A. Hawker, J. T. Granton, and B. M. Feldman, “Methods to elicit beliefs for Bayesian priors: a systematic review,” J. Clin. Epidemiol., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 355–369, 2010.
G. Parmigiani and L. Inoue, Decision theory: Principles and approaches. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
D. Robey, G. Im, and J. D. Wareham, “Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: assessing past contributions and guiding future directions,” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 9, no. 9, p. 4, 2008.
J. Lu, Z. Yan, J. Han, and G. Zhang, “Data-driven decision-making (d 3 m): Framework, methodology, and directions,” IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 286–296, 2019.
M. Ghavamzadeh, S. Mannor, J. Pineau, and A. Tamar, “Bayesian reinforcement learning: A survey,” Found. Trends® Mach. Learn., vol. 8, no. 5–6, pp. 359–483, 2015.
M. Toussaint, “Probabilistic inference as a model of planned behavior.,” Künstliche Intell., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 23–29, 2009.
L. A. Garrow, T. D. Bodea, and M. Lee, “Generation of synthetic datasets for discrete choice analysis,” Transportation (Amst)., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 183–202, 2010.
P. Dayan and N. D. Daw, “Decision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain,” Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 429–453, 2008.
P. Juslin and M. Persson, “PROBabilities from EXemplars (PROBEX): A ‘lazy’ algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 563–607, 2002.
T. Lange, M. Braun, V. Roth, and J. Buhmann, “Stability-based model selection,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 15, 2002.
R. A. Estévez, F. H. Alamos, T. Walshe, and S. Gelcich, “Accounting for uncertainty in value judgements when applying multi-attribute value theory,” Environ. Model. Assess., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 87–97, 2018.
S. S. Kamble and A. Gunasekaran, “Big data-driven supply chain performance measurement system: a review and framework for implementation,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 65–86, 2020.
J. Sagebiel, “Preference heterogeneity in energy discrete choice experiments: A review on methods for model selection,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 69, pp. 804–811, 2017.
P. Daee, T. Peltola, M. Soare, and S. Kaski, “Knowledge elicitation via sequential probabilistic inference for high-dimensional prediction,” Mach. Learn., vol. 106, no. 9, pp. 1599–1620, 2017.
W.-Y. Ahn and J. R. Busemeyer, “Challenges and promises for translating computational tools into clinical practice,” Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci., vol. 11, pp. 1–7, 2016.
N. Srivastava and P. Schrater, “Learning what to want: context-sensitive preference learning,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 10, p. e0141129, 2015.
S. A. Kassam and H. V. Poor, “Robust techniques for signal processing: A survey,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 433–481, 2005.
L. W. Green and R. E. Glasgow, “Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology,” Eval. Health Prof., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 126–153, 2006.
M. Doumpos and E. Grigoroudis, Multicriteria decision aid and artificial intelligence: links, theory and applications. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
S. R. Hong, J. Hullman, and E. Bertini, “Human factors in model interpretability: Industry practices, challenges, and needs,” Proc. ACM Human-Computer Interact., vol. 4, no. CSCW1, pp. 1–26, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jonhariono Sihotang, J Batubara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

