Main Article Content
Employee assessment is needed in evaluating performance and granting rewards to employees. PT. Kupu-Kupu Taman Lestari conducts an employee performance appraisal using Microsoft Excel. The growth of employee data and assessment variables resulted in the calculation method that was carried out could not provide employee ranking information quickly. The application of Microsoft Excel in processing employee valuation data has weaknesses in data documentation. The purpose of this study is the company has a website-based decision support system that makes it easy for companies to get employee performance appraisal information. The employee performance data ranking method used is the Analytical Network Process (ANP) and the performance evaluation criteria are prepared based on the Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale (BARS) approach. BARS is used in determining criteria along with a scale of behavior that represents the performance of each criterion. ANP is used to process data of importance between criteria so that it can produce criteria weights based on a comparison between criteria. The results of this study are website-based decision support systems that can be accessed by company management via a web browser. System testing is built based on testing manual calculations with the system and testing the user's system according to the McCall model. The system calculation test shows that the system has produced the same calculation value as the manual calculation. System user testing shows that the system built meets user needs, displays information according to user input correctly, is safe from unauthorized parties, and the system is easy to use.
S. Bag, L. C. Wood, S. K. Mangla, and S. Luthra, “Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 152, p. 104502, 2020.
A. S. DeNisi and K. R. Murphy, “Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress?,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 102, no. 3, p. 421, 2017.
Ž. Stević and N. Brković, “A novel integrated FUCOM-MARCOS model for evaluation of human resources in a transport company,” Logistics, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 4, 2020.
H. Urbancová, K. Stachová, and Z. Stacho, “Using of performance appraisal methods in Czech and Slovak organisations,” Qual. Innov. Prosper., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 62–77, 2017, doi: 10.12776/QIP.V21I3.890.
B. Bin Saeed, B. Afsar, S. Hafeez, I. Khan, M. Tahir, and M. A. Afridi, “Promoting employee’s proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 424–438, 2019.
D. J. Schleicher, H. M. Baumann, D. W. Sullivan, P. E. Levy, D. C. Hargrove, and B. A. Barros-Rivera, “Putting the system into performance management systems: A review and agenda for performance management research,” J. Manage., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2209–2245, 2018.
W. Alhazzani et al., “Surviving Sepsis Campaign: guidelines on the management of critically ill adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19),” Intensive Care Med., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 854–887, 2020.
P. Tambe, P. Cappelli, and V. Yakubovich, “Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward,” Calif. Manage. Rev., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 15–42, 2019.
W. Wang, Y. Cui, Y. Luo, Z. Li, and J. Tan, “Web-based decision support system for canal irrigation management,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 161, pp. 312–321, 2019.
R. Septifani, P. Deoranto, and T. W. Armanda, “Employee Performance Assessment Using Analytical Network Process and Rating Scale,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 70, 2020, doi: 10.22219/jtiumm.vol21.no1.70-79.
Anwar, “Employee Performance Appraisal Analysis with Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Rating Scale Method in Baitul Mall Lhokseumawe,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 505, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012065.
D. M. Klieger, H. J. Kell, S. Rikoon, K. N. Burkander, J. L. Bochenek, and J. R. Shore, “Development of the Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales for the Skills Demonstration and Progression Guide,” ETS Res. Rep. Ser., vol. 2018, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1002/ets2.12210.
E. D. Santoso, A. Fathoni, and L. B. Hasiholan, “Development of Employee Performance Appraisal of Honda Semarang Service Center,” J. Manage., vol. 4, no. 4, 2018.
M. Reisi, A. Afzali, and L. Aye, “Applications of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytical network process (ANP) for industrial site selections in Isfahan, Iran,” Environ. Earth Sci., vol. 77, no. 14, p. 0, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12665-018-7702-1.
M. Abdel-Basset, A. Atef, and F. Smarandache, “A hybrid Neutrosophic multiple criteria group decision making approach for project selection,” Cogn. Syst. Res., vol. 57, pp. 216–227, 2019.
Meiryani, P. Siagian, R. A. A. W. Puspokusumo, and Lusianah, “Decision making and management information systems,” J. Crit. Rev., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 320–325, 2020, doi: 10.31838/jcr.07.07.52.
Z. Zhai, J. F. Martínez, V. Beltran, and N. L. Martínez, “Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 170, p. 105256, 2020.
D. J. Power, “Computerized decision support case study research: concepts and suggestions,” in Real-World Decision Support Systems, Springer, 2016, pp. 1–13.
M. Shameem, R. R. Kumar, M. Nadeem, and A. A. Khan, “Taxonomical classification of barriers for scaling agile methods in global software development environment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 90, p. 106122, 2020.
O. M. Joffre, P. M. Poortvliet, and L. Klerkx, “To cluster or not to cluster farmers? Influences on network interactions, risk perceptions, and adoption of aquaculture practices,” Agric. Syst., vol. 173, pp. 151–160, 2019.
E. Mu, O. Cooper, and M. Peasley, “Best practices in Analytic Network Process studies,” Expert Syst. Appl., 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113536.
N. Kadoić, N. B. Ređep, and B. Divjak, “Decision making with the analytic network process,” 2017, doi: 10.1007/0-387-33987-6.
H. J. Kell, M. P. Martin-Raugh, L. M. Carney, P. A. Inglese, L. Chen, and G. Feng, “Exploring Methods for Developing Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales for Evaluating Structured Interview Performance,” ETS Res. Rep. Ser., vol. 2017, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2017, doi: 10.1002/ets2.12152.