Decision support system for selection of exemplary students using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/cit.Vol15.2023.461.pp96-107Keywords:
Analytical Hierarchy Process, Decision Support System, Exemplary Student, SelectionAbstract
The problem that occurs in determining exemplary students is the length of the process of determining the assessment of exemplary students, this is due to the fact that each teacher must first select potential exemplary students. After obtaining the names of prospective new model students, the selection of model students is carried out by an assessment team from the school. The purpose of this study is to select exemplary students at the end of each semester using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method. Based on the results of the assessment using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method, the first model student was obtained by Budi Riantono with a value of 0.250949, the second model student was obtained by Putri Azzahra with a value of 0.235755, the third model student was obtained by Akhmad Wijayanto with a value of 0.204881. The results of calculations between manual calculations and calculations using a web-based application show no difference in value and ranking. Then a web-based application is made based on the results of manual calculations using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method that has been made.
Downloads
References
S. Setiawansyah, A. T. Priandika, B. Ulum, A. D. Putra, and D. A. Megawaty, “UMKM Class Determination Support System Using Profile Matching,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 46–54, 2022.
A. F. O. Pasaribu and N. Nuroji, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Pelanggan Terbaik Menggunakan Profile Matching,” J. Data Sci. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2023.
A. Purnamawati, M. N. Winarto, and D. U. E. Saputri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Produk Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Preference Selection Index,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 56–67, 2023.
E. Ozcetin, G. Ozturk, Z. K. Ozturk, R. Kasimbeyli, and N. Kasimbeyli, “A decision support system for consolidated distribution of a ceramic sanitary ware company,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 213, p. 118785, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118785.
M. Nazim, C. Wali Mohammad, and M. Sadiq, “A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to software requirements selection,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 10851–10870, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.04.005.
H. K. Chan, X. Sun, and S.-H. Chung, “When should fuzzy analytic hierarchy process be used instead of analytic hierarchy process?,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 125, p. 113114, 2019.
F. Ahmed and K. Kilic, “Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 362, pp. 110–128, 2019.
M. Vojtek and J. Vojteková, “Flood susceptibility mapping on a national scale in Slovakia using the analytical hierarchy process,” Water, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 364, 2019.
E. Purba and H. T. Sihotang, “Decision Support System For Prospective Recipients Of The Healthy Indonesia Card (Kis) In The Village Of Bah Sidua Dua With The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method: Decision Support System For Prospective Recipients Of The Healthy Indonesia Card (Ki,” J. Mantik, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 82–90, 2019.
I. Sekovski, L. Del Río, and C. Armaroli, “Development of a coastal vulnerability index using analytical hierarchy process and application to Ravenna province (Italy),” Ocean Coast. Manag., vol. 183, p. 104982, 2020.
P. H. Dos Santos, S. M. Neves, D. O. Sant’Anna, C. H. de Oliveira, and H. D. Carvalho, “The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 212, pp. 119–138, 2019.
K. Gompf, M. Traverso, and J. Hetterich, “Using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to introduce weights to social life cycle assessment of mobility services,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1258, 2021.
Ö. Ekmekcio?lu, K. Koc, and M. Özger, “District based flood risk assessment in Istanbul using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process,” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., vol. 35, pp. 617–637, 2021.
J. A. Romero-Ramos, J. D. Gil, J. M. Cardemil, R. A. Escobar, I. Arias, and M. Pérez-García, “A GIS-AHP approach for determining the potential of solar energy to meet the thermal demand in southeastern Spain productive enclaves,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 176, p. 113205, 2023.
A. Sinha et al., “Wildfire risk zone mapping in contrasting climatic conditions: An approach employing AHP and F-AHP models,” Fire, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 44, 2023.
S. Kansara, S. Modgil, and R. Kumar, “Structural transformation of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process: a relevant case for Covid-19,” Oper. Manag. Res., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 450–465, 2023.
C. P. C. Senan et al., “Flood vulnerability of a few areas in the foothills of the Western Ghats: a comparison of AHP and F-AHP models,” Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 527–556, 2023.
J. Awad and C. Jung, “Extracting the planning elements for sustainable urban regeneration in Dubai with AHP (analytic hierarchy process),” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 76, p. 103496, 2022.
S. Panchal and A. K. Shrivastava, “Landslide hazard assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study of National Highway 5 in India,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 101626, 2022.
A. Zaki, D. Setiyadi, and F. N. Khasanah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Terbaik Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process,” J. Penelit. Ilmu Komputer, Syst. Embed. Log., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2018.
D. A. Anggoro and W. Supriyanti, “Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan Metode AHP untuk Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi di SMAN Kebakkramat,” J. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. UNSIQ, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 163–171, 2019, doi: 10.32699/ppkm.v6i3.777.
D. Dahriansah, A. Nata, and I. R. Harahap, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Berprestasi Pada Aliyah Aras Kabu Agung Tanjungbalai Menggunakan Metode AHP,” J-SISKO TECH, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–95, 2020.
L. P. Raghav, R. S. Kumar, D. K. Raju, and A. R. Singh, “Analytic hierarchy process (AHP)–swarm intelligence based flexible demand response management of grid-connected microgrid,” Appl. Energy, vol. 306, p. 118058, 2022.
S. Pant, A. Kumar, M. Ram, Y. Klochkov, and H. K. Sharma, “Consistency indices in analytic hierarchy process: a review,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1206, 2022.
H. Díaz, A. P. Teixeira, and C. G. Soares, “Application of Monte Carlo and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Processes for ranking floating wind farm locations,” Ocean Eng., vol. 245, p. 110453, 2022.
S. Xu, T. Yeyao, and M. Shabaz, “Multi-criteria decision making for determining best teaching method using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2795–2807, 2023.
M. Tavana, M. Soltanifar, F. J. Santos-Arteaga, and H. Sharafi, “Analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis: A match made in heaven,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 223, p. 119902, 2023.
S. L. Cobos-Mora, J. Guamán-Aucapiña, and J. Zúñiga-Ruiz, “Suitable site selection for transfer stations in a solid waste management system using analytical hierarchy process as a multi-criteria decision analysis: a case study in Azuay-Ecuador,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1944–1977, 2023.
Y. Mao, H. Xie, X. Zhang, F. Hou, and M. Wang, “Study on the Applicable Room Size Dimension of Stratum Ventilation for Heating Based on Multi-Criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process-Entropy Weight Model,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 381, 2023.
M. ?ahin, “Determining of learners’ intervention preferences in the digital learning environment based on analytic hierarchy process,” Interact. Learn. Environ., pp. 1–15, 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Susana Dwi Yulianti, Rini Nuraini, Mohammad Imam Shalahudin, M. Hadi Prayitno
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
